6 Comments
User's avatar
Jeremy's avatar

Even when I think I understand the material I find I have to play a game like this one and analyze it afterward before all the nuance will really stick. But then when reviewing lines in the future I’ll remember the game and the ideas.

Expand full comment
Boris's avatar

Wow, pretty advanced level!

Expand full comment
Lode Broekman's avatar

True.

Expand full comment
Llorenç Boldú Zabih's avatar

I prefer to study openings from books, there are more explanations, deeper. Then I build my pgns following the books and analyzing the model games. I think Grandmaster Repertoire from Quality Chess is excellent.

Expand full comment
Boris's avatar

Yes yes QC is good 😎

Expand full comment
Bill Matthews's avatar

Yep, totally agree. I love Sielecki's S+S Caro-Kann because after the line ends, he shows you your middlegame plans.

Expand full comment